Discover the trusted foundation for successful bone regeneration.
Your patients trust you - and you can always rely on Geistlich to deliver the best-in-class patient outcomes with Geistlich Bio-Oss® and Geistlich Bio-Gide®: the original natural bone substitute and original collagen membrane.
For decades, regeneration experts worldwide have achieved excellent peri-implant health, esthetics, and long-term implant success with our two gold-standard products – our trusted foundation for successful bone regeneration.
Get closer to the bone with Geistlich Bio-Oss® – the original natural bone substitute. Achieve brilliant results, even in challenging cases. Geistlich Bio-Oss® matches the quality and strength of natural bone5, offers excellent handling, and ensures consistent performance in daily clinical use.
- Easy application across a wide range of indications
- Long-term bone volume stability with minimal resorption
- Outstanding implant esthetics and functionality when combined with Geistlich Bio-Gide®
Achieve better patient outcomes and greater augmentation success. Even if wound healing complications arise, Geistlich Bio-Gide® – the original collagen membrane – continues to protect the grafted site, making it the trusted choice for predictable bone regeneration and long-term success.
- Exceptional strength, flexibility, and barrier function14,15,16
- Simplified surgeries - no need to remove the membrane
- Optimal tissue integration and wound stabilization11,17,18
- 11% more new bone formation with Geistlich Bio-Oss® and Geistlich Bio-Gide® vs Geistlich Bio-Oss® alone8
Order your free test kit now!
Test Geistlich Bio-Oss® & Geistlich Bio-Gide® and discover how easy it is to use them and get advice from our experts whenever needed. Our skilled sales team is always ready to support you, anticipating your needs and providing solutions before you even have to ask.
References:
- iData Research Inc., US Dental Bone Graft Substitutes and other Biomaterials Market, 2021.
- iData Research Inc., European Dental Bone Graft Substitutes and other Biomaterials Market, 2021.
- Data on file.
- Jung RE, et al., Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Dec;32(12):1455-1465. (clinical study)
- Benic GI, et al., J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Mar;44(3):315-325. (clinical study)
- Chappuis V, et al., J Dent Res. 2018 Mar;97(3):266-274. (clinical study)
- Perelman-Karmon M, et al., Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Aug;32(4):459-65. (clinical study)
- Tal H, et al., Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19 (3), 295-302. (clinical study)
- Knöfler W, et al., Int J Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;2(1):25. (clinical study)
- Rothamel D, et al., Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16 (3), 369-78. (pre-clinical study)
- Mordenfeld A, et al., Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep;21(9):961-70. (clinical study)
- Dinato TR, et al., J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Sep 1;16(9):e1110-e1119. (clinical study)
- Data on file.
- Urban IA et al.: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013; 33 (3), 299-307.
- Rothamel D et al.: Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16 (3), 369-78.
- Schwarz F et al. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(4):403-409. (Pre-clinical study)
- Schwarz F et al. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(4): 402-415. (Pre-clinical study)
